Client Experiences

Calculation: (87 − 18) ÷ 87 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (60 − 10) ÷ 60 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (90 − 27) ÷ 90 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (124 − 30) ÷ 124 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The card preserves the experience described by this contributor. A percentage is shown only when the starting figure and sentence support a clear comparison.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (36 − 9) ÷ 36 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (120 − 15) ÷ 120 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The card preserves the experience described by this contributor. A percentage is shown only when the starting figure and sentence support a clear comparison.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The card preserves the experience described by this contributor. A percentage is shown only when the starting figure and sentence support a clear comparison.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (108 − 18) ÷ 108 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (84 − 7) ÷ 84 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (100 − 10) ÷ 100 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (66 − 18) ÷ 66 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (84 − 12) ÷ 84 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (150 − 9) ÷ 150 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (48 − 11) ÷ 48 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (78 − 12) ÷ 78 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (60 − 15) ÷ 60 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (108 − 8) ÷ 108 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (90 − 18) ÷ 90 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (66 − 14) ÷ 66 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (54 − 15) ÷ 54 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (108 − 10) ÷ 108 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “home in 8 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 12 ÷ 48 × 100 = 25.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 36 × 100 = 22.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 18 ÷ 60 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 11 ÷ 42 × 100 = 26.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 15 ÷ 60 × 100 = 25.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 30 × 100 = 23.3%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 16 ÷ 54 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Calculation: (90 − 14) ÷ 90 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (96 − 8) ÷ 96 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 15 ÷ 54 × 100 = 27.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Calculation: (60 − 15) ÷ 60 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (72 − 17) ÷ 72 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (60 − 16) ÷ 60 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (96 − 11) ÷ 96 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (84 − 11) ÷ 84 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (60 − 16) ÷ 60 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (63 − 18) ÷ 63 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 15) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The additional day is retained in the sentence shown. No rounded percentage is substituted for that sentence.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (37 − 10) ÷ 37 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (70 − 24) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The additional day is retained in the sentence shown. No rounded percentage is substituted for that sentence.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (33 − 8) ÷ 33 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 14) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 12) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (63 − 18) ÷ 63 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (70 − 20) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 15) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The additional day is retained in the sentence shown. No rounded percentage is substituted for that sentence.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (78 − 24) ÷ 78 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (70 − 18) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (63 − 18) ÷ 63 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (41 − 10) ÷ 41 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (78 − 24) ÷ 78 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 14) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “halfway house at 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 6 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “home after 4.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served only 7 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served only 3.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

The additional day is retained in the sentence shown. No rounded percentage is substituted for that sentence.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (37 − 8) ÷ 37 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (46 − 10) ÷ 46 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (41 − 10) ÷ 41 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (33 − 7) ÷ 33 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 14) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (46 − 10) ÷ 46 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (51 − 12) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (41 − 10) ÷ 41 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (33 − 8) ÷ 33 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (33 − 8) ÷ 33 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (37 − 8) ÷ 37 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (46 − 10) ÷ 46 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (41 − 10) ÷ 41 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (46 − 10) ÷ 46 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (33 − 7) ÷ 33 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Calculation: (41 − 10) ÷ 41 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served only 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (97 − 18) ÷ 97 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (97 − 18) ÷ 97 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 7 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (121 − 24) ÷ 121 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 8 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (135 − 27) ÷ 135 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 7 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (121 − 24) ÷ 121 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (97 − 18) ÷ 97 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 6 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (108 − 20) ÷ 108 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 6 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (108 − 20) ÷ 108 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 4.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (70 − 15) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (97 − 18) ÷ 97 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 4.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (70 − 15) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (97 − 18) ÷ 97 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 3.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (51 − 12) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (87 − 18) ÷ 87 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 7 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (121 − 24) ÷ 121 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 3.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (51 − 12) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (87 − 18) ÷ 87 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 3.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (70 − 12) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 6 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (97 − 20) ÷ 97 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 3.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (51 − 12) ÷ 51 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 4.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (63 − 15) ÷ 63 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 3.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (63 − 12) ÷ 63 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 3 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (41 − 10) ÷ 41 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 4.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (70 − 15) ÷ 70 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Custody wording in the account: “served 2.5 months.” Prison, halfway-house placement, home confinement and completion of a sentence are different stages; this excerpt does not establish a complete custody timeline.

Calculation: (37 − 8) ÷ 37 × 100, rounded to one decimal place. This is a comparison with the reported starting figure, not a later reduction of the sentence imposed.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account. The date shown identifies the testimonial, not a court hearing or release date. Individual experiences do not establish typical results.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 17 ÷ 60 × 100 = 28.3%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 5 ÷ 24 × 100 = 20.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 10 ÷ 42 × 100 = 23.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 22 ÷ 72 × 100 = 30.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 30 × 100 = 26.7%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 10 ÷ 48 × 100 = 20.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 22 ÷ 72 × 100 = 30.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 14 ÷ 54 × 100 = 25.9%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 36 × 100 = 19.4%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 13 ÷ 48 × 100 = 27.1%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 14 ÷ 60 × 100 = 23.3%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 9 ÷ 42 × 100 = 21.4%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 12 ÷ 48 × 100 = 25.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 36 × 100 = 22.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 18 ÷ 60 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 10 ÷ 42 × 100 = 23.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 30 × 100 = 23.3%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 13 ÷ 48 × 100 = 27.1%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 9 ÷ 42 × 100 = 21.4%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 16 ÷ 60 × 100 = 26.7%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 16 ÷ 54 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 9 ÷ 36 × 100 = 25.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Halfway-house transfer. Calculation: 5 ÷ 18 × 100 = 27.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. This account identifies a halfway-house transfer. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 5 ÷ 18 × 100 = 27.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Home reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 5 ÷ 18 × 100 = 27.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 5 ÷ 18 × 100 = 27.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 5 ÷ 18 × 100 = 27.8%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 30.0%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 8 ÷ 27 × 100 = 29.6%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.

Time served reported; placement unspecified. Calculation: 7 ÷ 24 × 100 = 29.2%, rounded to one decimal place from the months supplied. This percentage describes the reported milestone; it is not a court-ordered sentence reduction or the percentage of the sentence eliminated.

Prison custody, halfway-house placement, home confinement and sentence completion are different stages. The account does not specify the placement or establish a sentence-completion date. Program eligibility, credits and release decisions are individual; this account does not establish which mechanism produced the timing.

Figures reflect the contributor’s account supplied by Joseph De Gregorio. Dates identify testimonials, not release dates. Individual results do not establish typical outcomes or guarantee another result.