Billing, Loss and Restitution Records in Healthcare Fraud Cases

Start with a record dictionary

Before combining spreadsheets, define the fields. Identify the service date, claim date, payer, provider, claim reference, amount submitted, amount allowed, payment, adjustment and refund where available. Preserve the source system and export date. A label such as “revenue” may mean something different in a bank statement, billing report and prosecution summary.

Keep the original export unchanged and use a separate working copy for notes. A total without its underlying period, units and calculation method is difficult to evaluate.

Keep the financial questions distinct

Amounts billed, amounts paid, alleged loss, a Guidelines loss determination, restitution, forfeiture and civil repayment obligations should not be treated as interchangeable. Counsel evaluates the legal treatment of each. Your preparation file can make that review more efficient by identifying the record behind each figure.

• Billed: what the submission record actually shows.
• Paid: what a payer or bank record establishes was received.
• Refunded or recovered: dated evidence of the recipient and transaction.
• Disputed: the specific assumption or entry requiring review.
• Ordered: the exact obligation stated in an applicable court or agency document.

Do not subtract a refund, settlement or forfeiture from another total on the assumption that it automatically creates a legal credit. Label the transaction and ask counsel to evaluate its significance.

Build a discrepancy register

For every unresolved difference, identify the two sources, the period they cover and the question to answer. Examples include a reversed claim that remains in a gross-billing report, duplicate exports, a payment that spans multiple services, or a company-wide total that extends beyond your employment dates. These are review questions, not findings that a loss calculation is wrong.

A useful register has five columns: issue number, source reference, observed difference, person responsible for review and status. Never remove entries merely because they are unfavorable. The objective is a complete, traceable record.

Connect numbers to responsibilities

Identify who could create, approve, transmit, correct or reverse a claim at each stage. A person’s access to a system does not by itself establish how the access was used. Link the chronology to permissions records, instructions, job descriptions and communications where counsel authorizes the review.

A hypothetical illustration: a report lists submissions across three locations, while an employee worked at one location during part of the period. The preparation question is which entries and dates counsel needs to examine. The spreadsheet does not decide relevant conduct or liability.

Maintain a separate restitution payment ledger

Record actual payments with date, amount, recipient, purpose and confirmation. Keep proposed payments and available assets in a separate section. A withdrawal from an account does not, by itself, show that a particular recipient received restitution. Ask counsel how existing orders, settlements or financial restrictions affect any proposed action.

Use the existing restitution payment ledger guide and loss-versus-restitution question sheet for the next level of detail.

The handoff to counsel and experts

The deliverable is an organized source index, a defined set of working schedules and a list of unresolved questions. It is not a forensic-accounting opinion, medical-necessity determination or legal calculation. Joseph can help organize the preparation process; counsel selects and directs the appropriate specialists.

Use the 2026 Guidelines Manual as a current reference, while counsel determines which manual and provisions apply to the case. A hearing date alone is not a complete manual-selection analysis.

Published analysis behind the preparation

Joseph De Gregorio is Founder and President of Sentencing Advocacy Group and a recurring published contributor to Bloomberg Law and Bloomberg Tax. The selections below connect his authored work to the preparation question on this page.

These publications address broader sentencing or financial-record preparation; they are not healthcare-specific clinical or billing opinions. Original article titles are retained as published. Publication does not imply publisher endorsement or a promised result.

Define the next step in your case

Request a private case review to discuss timing, preparation priorities and the scope of support. Defense counsel can use the attorney pathway to discuss a specific client or defined task.

Speak directly with Joseph: 646-588-8182