Sentencing Advocacy Group · Federal investigation preparation

IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI): What a Special Agent Contact Means

IRS Criminal Investigation investigates suspected tax and related financial crimes. A special agent’s contact calls for an assessment by qualified defense counsel; it does not establish guilt or predict charges. Sentencing Advocacy Group supports the personal-history and preparation work counsel considers appropriate, with a defined scope and no promise about the investigation’s outcome.

By Joseph De Gregorio, Founder & President · Updated November 4, 2026

Request a Private Case Review Speak with Joseph: (646) 588-8182

Please do not upload subpoenas, letters, privileged advice or investigative records. An inquiry does not establish an engagement.

What is IRS Criminal Investigation?

IRS-CI is the criminal investigative arm of the Internal Revenue Service. Its remit includes suspected tax crimes and related financial offenses. This is a different function from routine tax return examination or collection of an unpaid balance. The agency’s official overview explains its financial-investigation role.

For a business owner, executive or family member, the first difficulty is often understanding which process is actually underway. A letter about a tax balance, a civil examination and contact from a special agent are not interchangeable. A useful discussion with counsel begins with the specific document or contact, not an assumption based on a general internet description.

This page separates the government’s process from SAG’s preparation role. Defense counsel evaluates the law, the person’s status, communications with investigators and any potential response. SAG’s work concerns the individual’s personal record and the practical preparation tasks included in an agreed engagement. An investigation does not itself create a need for every service described here.

What does it mean when an IRS special agent contacts you?

The IRS distinguishes special agents from its civil examination and collection employees. Its contact guidance explains that special agents are federal law-enforcement officers and may make unannounced contact in connection with a criminal investigation. The meaning of a particular contact depends on circumstances that a general webpage cannot resolve.

The person contacted may not have a complete picture of what investigators are examining. The identity of the investigator, the subject of the request, the form of any document and the timing of earlier communications are different pieces of information. Counsel assesses them together. SAG does not infer guilt, a charging decision or a prosecution timetable from the fact of contact.

For someone accustomed to handling demanding business problems personally, the uncertainty can be difficult. The preparation work is more useful when it separates confirmed facts, recollection and unanswered questions. A date supported by a document can be identified as such. An approximate memory can remain approximate. A missing record can be listed as missing. Polished language cannot substitute for a reliable factual foundation.

Communication with agents, testimony, document production, preservation obligations and privilege remain matters for counsel. SAG does not provide a script for answering investigators or decide which records should be disclosed. Where a target letter or subpoena is involved, the actual document is central to counsel’s review.

How is a criminal tax investigation different from an audit?

The IRS describes revenue agents as examination employees and revenue officers as collection employees. Special agents investigate suspected criminal violations. These roles explain why the phrase “the IRS contacted me” is not enough to characterize a matter. Counsel and the appropriate tax professionals establish what the actual communication concerns.

An executive’s personal records may also be spread across several advisers. The accountant may hold tax-return material, a business may maintain employment records, and a family member may know about care responsibilities. That does not mean all those materials belong in the same file or should be shared with every participant. Counsel determines the appropriate boundaries for any investigation-related work.

Within an authorized personal-history assignment, SAG can identify the record categories needed for the agreed deliverable and distinguish what has been received from what remains outstanding. That administrative clarity is separate from a tax opinion, an audit response or an analysis of criminal exposure.

What is an IRS criminal referral?

The IRS’s description of the investigation process distinguishes evidence gathering, internal review and a recommendation for prosecution. A recommendation is not a conviction. Prosecutorial review is a separate stage, and the existence of an investigation does not establish its final disposition.

For preparation purposes, the important distinction is between what is known now and what might happen later. “An investigator made contact,” “counsel received a document,” and “a hearing has been scheduled” describe different circumstances. An engagement should reflect the confirmed stage and any verified dates rather than a predicted sequence.

SAG does not estimate the probability that an investigation will close or result in charges. Nor does it describe a personal narrative as a way to prevent prosecution. If counsel considers personal-history preparation appropriate, the scope can be organized around that purpose without assuming that the matter will proceed to sentencing.

Can you still use the Voluntary Disclosure Practice once IRS-CI is involved?

The IRS’s Voluntary Disclosure Practice guidance contains specific timeliness conditions, including restrictions relating to an examination, an investigation and information already received by the IRS. It also states that a voluntary disclosure does not automatically confer immunity. Eligibility cannot be determined from the date someone first learned about an investigation alone.

Whether a disclosure, an amended return, another compliance process or no such submission is appropriate is a legal and tax-professional assessment. SAG does not select a disclosure route, assess willfulness, prepare the application or predict how the government will treat it. A preparation engagement is not a substitute for that analysis.

The distinction also applies to how corrective work is described. A factual record can identify an action that actually occurred, its date and its supporting documentation. It cannot establish the action’s legal effect. Counsel evaluates whether the subject belongs in the work at all and how any resulting material may be used.

What tax charges follow an IRS-CI investigation?

There is no automatic sequence of charges that follows IRS-CI involvement. The agency describes investigations of suspected tax violations and related financial crimes; the evidence and applicable law determine the issues for prosecutors and counsel. A person’s profession, income or business size does not answer those questions.

SAG does not calculate a proposed sentence from a brief inquiry or tell someone which criminal provisions apply. If a matter later reaches sentencing, counsel addresses the charges, relevant legal standards and any disputed calculations. SAG’s personal-history preparation then follows the agreed sentencing-stage scope. The presentence interview preparation page explains that distinct phase of work.

Where does SAG fit alongside defense counsel?

SAG’s contribution is sustained attention to the person and the supporting record. An executive may have decades of employment, complex family responsibilities and records in several locations. Those facts deserve accurate treatment. They do not become legal arguments merely because they have been organized in a document.

Joseph works directly with the client on the agreed preparation assignment. Counsel retains responsibility for legal advice, government communications, filings and strategic decisions. The scope identifies the work product, the people involved, the delivery schedule and the review process. A defined assignment makes it possible to see what has been completed and what remains unresolved.

What makes the personal record useful?

Specificity matters. “Responsible for family care” leaves important factual questions unanswered. A more useful personal-history account identifies the relationship, the actual responsibilities, the period involved and available support for those facts. It also distinguishes what the client does personally from what others provide. That is an organizational standard, not a prediction about legal significance.

The same discipline applies to employment and community activities. Titles, responsibilities and dates can be described accurately without overstating influence or importance. A professional achievement does not erase an allegation. A record can explain a person’s history while leaving contested conduct and legal conclusions to counsel.

Gaps are part of the work. An unavailable document, an uncertain date or differing recollections should remain visible for review. A compelling narrative is not a license to fill missing information with assumptions. SAG’s preparation role depends on presenting the person’s account accurately and distinguishing it from corroboration that has actually been supplied.

How does this work differ from legal or accounting work?

A personal-history interview does not determine tax liability. An indexed file does not establish that records are legally responsive to a demand. A chronology does not determine intent or resolve a disputed transaction. Each professional’s responsibilities need to remain clear so the client understands what the engagement delivers.

The attorney collaboration page describes the intended working relationship. Counsel can define the information relevant to a preparation assignment and identify the subjects that should remain outside it. SAG does not promise that an engagement, a conversation or a document is privileged.

How can a family support preparation without taking over the legal work?

Families often manage practical responsibilities while the person under investigation is focused on counsel and business obligations. Within an agreed scope, family participation can help identify schedules, care responsibilities and the location of personal records. Participation depends on the client’s authorization and the boundaries established for the work.

A useful family contact arrangement identifies who receives administrative updates, who can provide background information and which questions belong with counsel. SAG’s communications concern the authorized preparation work. Family involvement does not mean that legal advice or investigative records should circulate broadly.

The work can also distinguish the person’s present responsibilities from anticipated changes. Current care needs, an existing job and a proposed future plan are different facts. Describing each accurately prevents a draft from treating an intention as an accomplished action. Where supporting documentation is unavailable, the limitation can remain explicit.

What happens if the matter later reaches sentencing?

The preparation assignment can change when the case stage changes. A presentence interview may call for a more detailed account of personal history and supporting documents. A sentencing submission may require counsel to evaluate material that was not relevant earlier. The scope is reviewed against the current circumstances rather than assumed at the start.

That distinction is especially important during an investigation. Beginning an appropriate personal-record assignment is not an admission of guilt and is not a prediction that charges will be filed. SAG does not encourage a premature account of disputed conduct. Counsel determines the appropriate boundaries for any narrative touching the allegations.

For a matter already approaching sentencing, the sentencing preparation service provides a separate description of the work. The purpose of these connected guides is to help readers identify the relevant stage and professional role, without treating every investigation as the same case.

What should an initial private case review cover?

The first conversation establishes the stage, the preparation need and whether SAG’s role fits. Useful administrative context includes whether counsel is already involved, whether there is a confirmed upcoming date and which type of support is being considered. Detailed allegations and investigative documents are not needed in a website inquiry.

Before any engagement begins, the scope can identify a specific deliverable and a practical working arrangement. It can also establish who reviews drafts, how revisions will be handled and how the client will distinguish completed work from open questions. That clarity is more useful than a broad promise to handle everything.

Joseph’s Bloomberg Tax publication record and published analysis and professional education provide background on his work. Publications are offered for readers to evaluate relevant experience. They do not establish an expected outcome or imply endorsement of a particular engagement.

Frequently asked questions

Official sources

Sources checked November 4, 2026. General information cannot resolve the facts or legal questions in an individual matter.

• IRS: About Criminal Investigation
• IRS: How to know it’s the IRS
• IRS: How criminal investigations are initiated
• IRS Criminal Investigation Voluntary Disclosure Practice

Related investigation guides

Federal investigation preparation hub · SEC investigations and Wells notices · Federal target letters and subpoenas