Federal Bar Association publications / 2026 fraud amendments
FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION · OCTOBER 27, 2026
The 2026 Fraud Amendments Reward Documentation. Most PSRs Aren’t Built to Contain It.
By Joseph De Gregorio
Founder & President, Sentencing Advocacy Group
Published analysis on federal sentencing preparation, the presentence report and the evidence behind an individualized sentencing request.
Read the original Federal Bar Association article ↗What the article explains
Joseph examines the relationship between fraud sentencing provisions and the factual record needed to support their consideration. The analysis emphasizes dated records of cessation, disclosure and restitution, alongside independent corroboration of pressure or vulnerability. A narrative becomes more useful when its important assertions can be checked against reliable sources.
Why preparation starts before the PSR interview
The practical takeaway is early organization: build a chronology, locate the supporting records and identify unresolved gaps before the presentence interview. Counsel can then evaluate the applicable guideline language and decide what information to submit, how to address uncertainty and which arguments the facts support.
From published analysis to your preparation
Work directly with Joseph to define a preparation plan tied to your next deadline. An engagement can include personal-history development, a document inventory, factual chronology, interview preparation and an organized handoff to defense counsel.
Preparation should distinguish confirmed facts, missing records and matters requiring further review. Your written scope identifies the deliverables, timing and responsibilities for your circumstances.
Explore Federal PSR Preparation →
Explore Federal Sentencing Preparation →
Information for defense counsel →
RELATED FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS
Judicial Sentencing Discretion After Booker: What the Pre-Sentence Report Actually Determines
The earlier article, linked within the new publication, examines the presentence report and the factual foundation for individualized sentencing. Read the two pieces together for Joseph’s discussion of judicial discretion and documentation.
Read Joseph’s earlier Federal Bar Association article ↗Define your next steps with Joseph.
Request a private case review to discuss your stage, deadlines and preparation priorities.
Request a Private Case ReviewAbout Joseph De Gregorio → · Media & Publications →
Sentencing Advocacy Group provides consulting and preparation services and is not a law firm. Counsel evaluates legal applicability and retains responsibility for legal advice, arguments and filings. Outcomes vary. Publication and use of the publisher’s logo identify authored work and do not imply endorsement.