A Treatment Progress Letter Is Not a Character Reference
Direct answer: A treatment progress letter addresses clinical work within the provider’s knowledge. A character reference describes personal observations and opinions. Neither should be presented as proving more than its writer is qualified and able to establish.
Ask the right person the right question
Joseph’s Bloomberg article distinguishes clinical documentation from a general endorsement, and his Law360 analysis with Richard Levitt develops that distinction. A treating professional may explain the treatment relationship, assessed needs and supported progress. A friend cannot supply that clinical foundation simply by describing someone as changed.
Preserve the clinician’s independence
Counsel can explain the context and request relevant information, but should not dictate a favorable diagnosis or conclusion. The letter should reflect the clinician’s judgment, including uncertainty and limits. Attendance alone should not be rewritten as proof that a condition has resolved.
Review the appropriate level of disclosure
Clinical records contain sensitive information. A progress summary, full notes and a forensic assessment are different documents with different purposes. The clinician and counsel should determine what is appropriate for the case, with the patient’s informed involvement as applicable.
Preparation checklist
- Who is writing and in what professional role?
- What period and type of work can the writer describe?
- What observations support the stated progress?
- What remains uncertain or outside the writer’s role?
- What disclosure has counsel reviewed?
Should a therapist promise that I will not reoffend?
A provider should not be pressured into unsupported guarantees. Any opinion must remain within their expertise and the evidence available.
Published analysis behind this resource
- Law360: Keys to Effective Mental Health Mitigation in Sentencing (January 29, 2026)
- Bloomberg Law: How to Get a Judge to Reduce Your Client’s White-Collar Sentence (December 8, 2025)
This resource adapts preparation principles from Joseph’s published analysis. Publication does not imply publisher endorsement of Sentencing Advocacy Group.
Continue with the related SAG guide, explore the published work, or read Client Results & Experiences.
Discuss the next preparation step
Joseph De Gregorio has been retained in more than 500 federal cases. Contact Sentencing Advocacy Group to discuss preparation alongside defense counsel.