Federal sentencing preparation · Client-reported experience
Richard P.: 9 months against a reported 150-month starting figure
Richard’s account emphasizes systematic preparation and personal change. His published testimonial reports a 150-month starting figure and a nine-month sentence. The arithmetic is a 94% difference; the account does not identify the starting figure as an adopted guideline range or a government recommendation.
Reported starting figure: 150 months
Reported sentence imposed: 9 months
(150 − 9) ÷ 150 × 100 = 94.0%, rounded to one decimal place. This compares two reported figures; it is not a later reduction of an imposed sentence.
The client’s perspective
Joseph’s systematic mitigation strategy was comprehensive beyond belief. … The transformation he guided me through was genuine and life-changing.
Richard P. · Testimonial dated April 11, 2026. This is the testimonial date, not an established sentencing date. Source: SAG Client Experiences.
The account describes the client’s experience of working with Joseph De Gregorio. It does not isolate the effect of any one contributor on the sentence imposed. Defense counsel’s advocacy, the complete case record and the court’s decision must be considered separately.
Documenting change before sentencing
The useful preparation question is what evidence supports a person’s account of change. A personal statement can introduce that story, while a dated record of completed work makes it easier to examine. Organizing records, identifying missing documentation and explaining the sequence of events are practical preparation tasks.
- Create a dated timeline of relevant steps already completed.
- Separate documented actions from future intentions.
- Identify which supporting records are available for counsel to assess.
These are general preparation considerations, not a reconstruction of steps taken in this client’s case.
What this sentence comparison establishes
The published account supports a client-reported numerical comparison. It does not supply the court record needed to verify the starting figure, the sentence or the reasons for the result independently. The starting number is therefore labeled “reported starting figure,” rather than guideline range, statutory maximum or government recommendation.
A reader searching for a sentence reduction should distinguish preparation before the original sentencing from a request to modify a sentence afterward. This account concerns the reported sentence imposed. It does not establish eligibility for any post-sentencing relief.
Build a preparation plan around your case
Work directly with Joseph De Gregorio, federal sentencing strategist and founder of Sentencing Advocacy Group. A private case review begins with your stage, deadlines and preparation needs. The engagement scope is defined around your circumstances, with defense counsel responsible for legal advice, filings and courtroom advocacy.
Apply for a Private Case ReviewSentencing Advocacy Group is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Individual experiences do not establish typical results. No sentence reduction or release outcome is guaranteed.
Explore related sentencing experiences
Published October 9, 2026 · Sentencing Advocacy Group. Source: the contributor account published on the Client Experiences page.